Re: Buildfarm vs. Linux Distro classification

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Subject: Re: Buildfarm vs. Linux Distro classification
Date: 2006-09-11 19:38:33
Message-ID: 200609112138.33644.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> The buildfarm script already seems to record various info such as
> "uname" output on-the-fly. If we could get it to record compiler
> version ("gcc -v" is easy, but equivalent incantations for vendor
> compilers might be harder to find) and a few other facts on-the-fly,
> I think the instability of the platforms might not be that big a
> deal.

The configure script actually tries to get the compiler to put out a
version number, and you can see the result of that in config.log.

For other components, however, it seems impossible to get the version
numbers across platforms.

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gregory Stark 2006-09-11 20:24:04 Re: Fixed length data types issue
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-09-11 19:32:45 Re: -HEAD planner issue wrt hash_joins on dbt3 ?