| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: Buildfarm vs. Linux Distro classification |
| Date: | 2006-09-11 18:17:58 |
| Message-ID: | 20060911181758.GE28613@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote:
> well I think Andrew is more scared of having multiple boxes on the
> buildfarm all stating to be "Debian testing" or "Debian unstable" but
> without much information on how regulary those boxes are actually synced
> to those moving/changing branches and causing discussions on "why is it
> suddenly failung on that box but not on the other".
It might make sense to attach the version information (in this case,
gcc, glibc, kernel versions) to each particular test run, rather than to
each particular farm member.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stefan Kaltenbrunner | 2006-09-11 18:21:02 | Re: Buildfarm vs. Linux Distro classification |
| Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2006-09-11 18:11:30 | New job |