From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: CMD + PostgreSQL Kudos |
Date: | 2006-09-09 05:00:08 |
Message-ID: | 20060909050008.GN5892@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Jeff Davis wrote:
> >On Fri, 2006-09-08 at 19:17 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> >>https://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?forum_id=610401
> >
> >I remember that SF.net was on PostgreSQL, then I thought they moved to
> >Oracle. Are they back on PostgreSQL now? Am I completely mistaken?
>
> I don't know much about the old stuff. I can tell you that they now run
> PostgreSQL 8.1.4.
They were running Postgres 7.2 back then and migrated to DB2 because IBM
gave licenses to them for free. They made a press release out of this,
so you might be able to find it. The free license term expired (or is
about to expire, not sure), so they came back and are very happy because
the current version of Postgres is just so much better than what 7.2
was.
They had migrated to Postgres from MySQL, around 2000/2001 I think, and
they made a lot of noise about it because Postgres was so much better.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Christopher Browne | 2006-09-09 10:20:58 | Re: CMD + PostgreSQL Kudos |
Previous Message | Robert Treat | 2006-09-09 04:43:49 | Re: CMD + PostgreSQL Kudos |