Re: log_duration is redundant, no?

On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 06:06:51PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Guillaume Smet" <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > I mean:
> > log_duration = on
> > log_min_duration_statement = 500
> > would log only duration for queries faster than 500 ms and
> > duration + query text for queries slower than 500ms (we can easily
> > avoid redundancy).
>
> I don't find this very persuasive --- it sounds awfully messy, and
> in fact isn't that exactly the old behavior we got rid of because no
> one could understand it?

Guillaume's the author of pgfouine, which understands it and helps
others to do same.

Cheers,
D
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666
Skype: davidfetter

Remember to vote!