From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Build date for snapshots? |
Date: | 2006-09-07 05:24:41 |
Message-ID: | 20060907022348.Q13992@ganymede.hub.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 6 Sep 2006, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Josh,
>
>>>> Well, you could grep for the latest $PostgreSQL$ header line's commit
>>>> date, but I kinda wonder why exactly you should need to do that. If you
>>>> don't know when you pulled the snapshot you are testing, I submit you
>>>> have a process problem you ought to fix.
>>>
>>> These aren't PostgreSQL test people, but folks from Java and the like
>>> testing other stuff. And they're pulling the build from ftp:/pub/dev/,
>>> not from CVS.
>>
>> O.k. but why aren't they submitting pgsql-bugs?
>
> Believe me, you don't want these people submitting bugs unfiltered by me.
> Especially since they can't remember when they grabbed the snapshot.
>
> Seriously, though, it would be an aid to testing if we could add a tag to the
> version or README file or something for the pgsql-snapshot that told us build
> date.
How about adding a simple: 'touch snapshotdate' .. in the root directory?
Would that suffice?
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org MSN . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paesold | 2006-09-07 05:43:44 | Re: FE/BE protocol vs. parameterized queries |
Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2006-09-07 04:42:25 | Re: Build date for snapshots? |