Re: On DNS for postgresql.org

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Steve Atkins <steve(at)blighty(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: On DNS for postgresql.org
Date: 2006-09-07 04:03:01
Message-ID: 20060907010149.J13992@ganymede.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, 6 Sep 2006, Joshua D. Drake wrote:

>
>> If we were playing DNS body part size wars then who has the bigger DNS clue
>> might be relevant. We're not, though. Rather I'm saying that publicly
>> criticizing people who volunteer services to a project, about things that
>> are not related to the services they're providing is at best a little
>> impolite.
>
> Well this is fun. I suggest that you review Andrew's comments again. Nothing
> he said was personal, they were direct criticisms of possible technical
> administration failures.

Agreed ... I know I didn't take his comments personally, and as soon as I
read them, I email'd him offlist asking for pointers / elaboration, as it
was the first I knew that I might have something 'bad' setup ...

----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org MSN . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Merlin Moncure 2006-09-07 04:13:11 Re: Problems with sequences
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2006-09-07 04:01:07 Re: On DNS for postgresql.org