| From: | Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)oryx(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Problems with extended-Query logging code |
| Date: | 2006-09-07 00:56:46 |
| Message-ID: | 20060907005646.GA28998@penne.toroid.org |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
At 2006-09-06 18:01:38 -0400, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us wrote:
>
> That is, we'd log a Parse or Bind operation if it individually
> exceeded the duration threshold, and not otherwise.
Ok.
> If we've got support for logging the statement text and the parameter
> values at Execute time, isn't logging the preliminary steps just
> bloating the log?
Agreed. Logging Parse/Bind only if they're particularly interesting
sounds good to me.
> * I think that the best way to log bind-parameter values is to run the
> datatype output functions on the saved parameter values. This works
> whether they were sent in text or binary mode, and avoids any extra
> overhead at Bind time that might not be repaid.
Great. (The logging of binary parameters is something I also... not
exactly _need_, but would be happy about.)
-- ams
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2006-09-07 01:14:38 | Re: gBorg status? |
| Previous Message | Gavin Sherry | 2006-09-07 00:38:32 | Re: Timezone List |