From: | Randall Lucas <rlucas(at)tercent(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Philippe Lang <philippe(dot)lang(at)attiksystem(dot)ch> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Plperl functions with OUT parameters crashing each other when used in the same connection |
Date: | 2006-09-05 05:03:15 |
Message-ID: | 20060905050315.GE8397@ontology.tercent.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 06:16:49PM +0200, Philippe Lang wrote:
> > I have deleted the subroutines now, but problem remains. Does
> > that mean the variables created inside a plperl function are
> > alive for the duration of the database connection?
>
> It seems to be the case: if I rename all the variables in foo2 function, I do not have anymore problems.
>
> Is there a way to "flush" all the variables explicitely?
It seems to me you should be using lexical block-scoped variables, along the
lines of:
$$
do {
my @i = ('a','b'); # etc.
}
$$
Of course, doing the above doesn't give you the benefits of using
'strict', which enforces declaration (and hence encourages local
scoping) of variables. The following article may cast some light on
using strict (and indeed, plperl in general) with postgres:
http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/databases/2006/05/25/the-future-of-perl-in-postgresql.html
Best,
Randall
--
Randall Lucas Tercent, Inc. DF93EAD1
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Oleg Bartunov | 2006-09-05 05:40:00 | Re: Two billion records ok? |
Previous Message | Zlatko Matić | 2006-09-05 04:54:01 | Upgrade Postgres 8.1.2 to 8.1.4 |