Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Suppress some NOTICE

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Suppress some NOTICE
Date: 2006-09-02 16:07:15
Message-ID: 200609021607.k82G7Fv00517@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >> Both createuser and vacuumdb provide the same feedback as the
> >> corresponding SQL commands.
> >>
> >> The more I think about it, the patch that just went in is an outright
> >> mistake.
>
> > Well, we had a lot of discussion when this patch was posted, and seveal
> > people liked it. I need someone else to say they want it reverted.
>
> I agree with Peter: that patch is a quick hack not a considered solution.
>
> As for "several people said they liked it", where? I don't see even
> one followup to
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2006-06/msg00049.php

The issue is that the patch was at the end of a thread, and no one said
they didn't like it, and no one said anything when it was placed in the
patch queue. I take that as acceptance.

But now that two people do not like it, patch reverted.

--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hannu Krosing 2006-09-02 16:30:16 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Allow PL/python to return
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2006-09-02 15:56:41 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Allow PL/python to return

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Treat 2006-09-02 16:07:16 Re: Getting a move on for 8.2 beta
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2006-09-02 16:06:15 Re: Postgres tracking - the pgtrack project