From: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Jasbinder Bali <jsbali(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Version 1 Calling convention |
Date: | 2006-08-30 10:09:55 |
Message-ID: | 20060830100955.GK13929@svana.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-novice |
On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 06:05:18AM -0400, Jasbinder Bali wrote:
> Does that mean if I am passing a char value to the version 1 function from a
> function in the database then in the version 1 function it needs to be
> treated as text*??
It depends on what type you're passing:
char -> PG_GETARG_CHAR => char
cstring -> PG_GETARG_CSTRING => char*
text -> PG_GETARG_TEXT_P => text*
What type is it in SQL terms? That tells you what type you use at the C
level.
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pantelis Natsiavas | 2006-08-30 10:29:35 | Encoding problem |
Previous Message | Jasbinder Bali | 2006-08-30 10:05:18 | Re: Version 1 Calling convention |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | roy simkes | 2006-08-31 13:05:10 | moving content of a table to another table |
Previous Message | Jasbinder Bali | 2006-08-30 10:05:18 | Re: Version 1 Calling convention |