From: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Perez <arturo(at)ethicist(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: xpath_string and group by |
Date: | 2006-08-29 10:54:58 |
Message-ID: | 20060829105458.GB22806@svana.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Sat, Aug 26, 2006 at 03:51:06PM -0400, Perez wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Using 8.1.4 and contrib/xml2. When I do a
>
> select xpath_string(note, '//Thing') as note,
> count(aDate) from theTable
> group by lower(xpath_string(note, '//Thing'))
> order by 2 desc;
>
> I get an error:
> GROUP BY must contain note.
> But I can do that for a plain text/varchar field. Adding the non-xpath
> note field messes up the grouping.
I wonder if it's getting confused about which "note" you're referring
to in the GROUP BY clause.
> select note, count(aDate) from
> (select lower(xpath_string(note, '//Thing')) as note, aDate from
> theTable) as foo
> group by note
This is about the same thing, so why not use that?
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Arturo Perez | 2006-08-29 11:05:44 | Re: xpath_string and group by |
Previous Message | Tiger Quimpo | 2006-08-29 09:17:07 | Re: Shared Objects (Dynamic loading) |