From: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-documentation <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] New XML section for documentation |
Date: | 2006-08-26 17:29:40 |
Message-ID: | 20060826172940.GO11427@fetter.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Aug 26, 2006 at 01:16:06PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> David Fetter wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 26, 2006 at 12:48:32PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > David Fetter wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Aug 25, 2006 at 08:37:19PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > > > > > Speaking of other parts of the SQL:2003 standard, how about one
> > > > > > section each that mentions them? There's
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Part 4: SQL/PSM (Persistent Stored Modules)
> > > > > > Part 9: SQL/MED (Management of External Data) (my favorite)
> > > > > > Part 10: SQL/OLB (Object Language Binding)
> > > > > > Part 11: SQL/Schemata
> > > > > > Part 13: SQL/JRT (Java Routines and Types)
> > > > >
> > > > > I don't know anything about them.
> > > >
> > > > We claim SQL standard compliance, so since those are part of
> > > > SQL:2003, we probably ought to mention them. SQL/PSM is a
> > > > programming language that lives inside the database, and DB2 and
> > > > MySQL have it. SQL/MED lets people talk to other data stores.
> > > > SQL/OLB appears to be derived from equel, which we have as ecpg.
> > > > SQL/Schemata contains the information schema. SQL/JRT appears to
> > > > bear some similarity to PL/Java and PL/J.
> > >
> > > I think the big question is whether we are ever going to implement
> > > these? I think we need to decide that before I mention them.
> >
> > The SQL/Schemata thing is already in. I think we should at least
>
> Uh, what is the SQL/Schemata? Are you sure it is in CVS?
It contains the information schema, among other things. We've had the
information schema for awhile. :)
> > mention which features that we already have are from what part of
> > the standard. As far as the rest of the standard goes, we might
> > want to mention whether we've even considered any of each piece in
> > the TODO list, and what sub-pieces, if any, are already
> > included/scheduled/too silly to contemplate :)
>
> Well, this seems like something that belongs in our chapter on how
> we support the SQL standard.
I'm not too fussy about where it first goes in. Just *that* it goes
in somewhere. I'll be happy to start the needed patches. :)
Cheers,
D
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666
Skype: davidfetter
Remember to vote!
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-08-26 17:31:20 | Re: [HACKERS] New XML section for documentation |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-08-26 17:16:06 | Re: [HACKERS] New XML section for documentation |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-08-26 17:31:20 | Re: [HACKERS] New XML section for documentation |
Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2006-08-26 17:21:49 | Re: Adding fulldisjunctions to the contrib |