From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-documentation <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] New XML section for documentation |
Date: | 2006-08-26 16:48:32 |
Message-ID: | 200608261648.k7QGmWk04757@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers |
David Fetter wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 25, 2006 at 08:37:19PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > David Fetter wrote:
> > > On Fri, Aug 25, 2006 at 07:46:57PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > > Here is an new XML section for our SGML documentation. It
> > > > explains the various XML capabilities, if we support them, and
> > > > how to use them.
> > > >
> > > > Comments?
> > >
> > > This looks hauntingly similar to Peter's presentation at the
> >
> > I used the XML/SQL and validation part from his talk, but the rest
> > was from earlier email discussions.
>
> Reuse is good :)
>
> > > conference. :) I'd add a http://wiscorp.com/SQLStandards.html to the
> >
> > This seems to be the best URL, but it seems too detailed:
> >
> > http://wiscorp.com/H2-2005-197-SC32N1293-WG3_Presentation_for_SC32_20050418.pdf
>
> I'd just put the http://wiscorp.com/SQLStandards.html URL in, as it
> contains several references in varying levels of detail.
OK, added.
> > > reference section.
> > >
> > > Speaking of other parts of the SQL:2003 standard, how about one
> > > section each that mentions them? There's
> > >
> > > Part 4: SQL/PSM (Persistent Stored Modules)
> > > Part 9: SQL/MED (Management of External Data) (my favorite)
> > > Part 10: SQL/OLB (Object Language Binding)
> > > Part 11: SQL/Schemata
> > > Part 13: SQL/JRT (Java Routines and Types)
> >
> > I don't know anything about them.
>
> We claim SQL standard compliance, so since those are part of SQL:2003,
> we probably ought to mention them. SQL/PSM is a programming language
> that lives inside the database, and DB2 and MySQL have it. SQL/MED
> lets people talk to other data stores. SQL/OLB appears to be derived
> from equel, which we have as ecpg. SQL/Schemata contains the
> information schema. SQL/JRT appears to bear some similarity to
> PL/Java and PL/J.
I think the big question is whether we are ever going to implement
these? I think we need to decide that before I mention them.
--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-08-26 16:50:59 | Re: New XML section for documentation |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-08-26 16:47:22 | Re: New XML section for documentation |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-08-26 16:50:59 | Re: New XML section for documentation |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-08-26 16:47:22 | Re: New XML section for documentation |