Re: [Open Item] Re: Autovacuum on by default?

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [Open Item] Re: Autovacuum on by default?
Date: 2006-08-26 06:10:07
Message-ID: 200608260810.08228.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> I thought we had agreed it would be a good idea to turn autovac_delay
> on?

We had not, because there was no experience available about where to put
the default numbers.

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nikolay Samokhvalov 2006-08-26 06:37:19 Re: New XML section for documentation
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2006-08-26 06:08:12 Re: New XML section for documentation