| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Autovacuum on by default? |
| Date: | 2006-08-25 15:36:44 |
| Message-ID: | 200608251736.45031.peter_e@gmx.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Am Freitag, 25. August 2006 17:32 schrieb Matthew T. O'Connor:
> While there is talk of removing this all together, I think it was also
> agreed that as long as these values are there, they should be reduced.
> I think the defaults in 8.1 are 1000/500, I think 200/100 was suggested.
I'm thinking leaving them higher would offset the jump in the scale factor a
bit. But if the idea is to get rid of the base threshold, then that's not
really a forward-looking strategy, I suppose.
I don't mind if we go down with the scale factor a little less and move the
threshold down more, but at least tying the scale factor to the fill factor
doesn't make all those numbers too random.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2006-08-25 15:38:20 | Re: [GENERAL] invalid byte sequence ? |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2006-08-25 15:34:30 | Re: Tricky bugs in concurrent index build |