| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, pgsqlrpms-hackers(at)pgfoundry(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Safer auto-initdb for RPM init script |
| Date: | 2006-08-25 15:16:23 |
| Message-ID: | 200608251716.24939.peter_e@gmx.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Am Freitag, 25. August 2006 16:54 schrieb Tom Lane:
> No, it doesn't. (The Red Hat RPMs in fact did that ... for about
> a week ... until I was told in no uncertain terms that we don't
> start unnecessary daemons by default.)
Well, there seem to be philosophical differences between the various operating
systems -- "We won't install unnecessary packages." vs. "We won't start
unnecessary daemons in unnecessarily installed packages." -- in which case
your solution doesn't sound all that bad.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-08-25 15:17:09 | Re: Tricky bugs in concurrent index build |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2006-08-25 15:14:49 | Re: [Pgsqlrpms-hackers] Safer auto-initdb for RPM initscript |