| From: | mark(at)mark(dot)mielke(dot)cc |
|---|---|
| To: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Douglas McNaught <doug(at)mcnaught(dot)org>, Naz Gassiep <naz(at)mira(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL on 64 bit Linux |
| Date: | 2006-08-21 15:48:01 |
| Message-ID: | 20060821154801.GA17414@mark.mielke.cc |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 05:13:58PM +0200, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> On the whole, PostgreSQL is still in the phase where we're trying to
> find the best algorithms. When that's done (if ever), we can start
> worrying about processor optimisations...
I don't disagree. :-)
You claimed that PostgreSQL is not tuned to a specific processor, and
relies on the kernel, the compiler, and libc to perform some tuning. I
agree with this as well.
Cheers,
mark
--
mark(at)mielke(dot)cc / markm(at)ncf(dot)ca / markm(at)nortel(dot)com __________________________
. . _ ._ . . .__ . . ._. .__ . . . .__ | Neighbourhood Coder
|\/| |_| |_| |/ |_ |\/| | |_ | |/ |_ |
| | | | | \ | \ |__ . | | .|. |__ |__ | \ |__ | Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
One ring to rule them all, one ring to find them, one ring to bring them all
and in the darkness bind them...
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stefan Kaltenbrunner | 2006-08-21 16:04:14 | Re: Replication |
| Previous Message | Markus Schiltknecht | 2006-08-21 15:44:30 | Re: Replication |