Re: installcheck-parallel

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: installcheck-parallel
Date: 2006-08-18 15:10:30
Message-ID: 200608181510.k7IFAUl06385@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> >
> > I see that the installcheck-parallel was not added to the top level
> > Makefile and Gnumakefile.in when it was added as a regression test
> > target back in the 8.0 cycle. Is there any objection to my adding it
> > now so that it is treated the same as the other regression test
> > targets? If so, should I add it just to HEAD, or backpatch it to 8.0
> > and 8.1? (Reasoning: I got confused for a few seconds and thought
> > maybe I had mistyped the target name, before I realised what was
> > wrong, but others less familiar than I am with the testing structure
> > might well get rather more confused.)
> >
>
> I didn't get any response to this so I'm going to add this and back port
> it, since the risk factor is pretty well zero, and I suspect it was just
> an inadvertent omission a couple of years ago.

Agreed.

--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Walter Cruz 2006-08-18 15:51:27 find the template of a database in SQL
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-08-18 14:48:36 Re: "cache reference leak" and "problem in alloc set" warnings