Re: Autovacuum on by default?

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Autovacuum on by default?
Date: 2006-08-18 01:26:21
Message-ID: 200608180126.k7I1QLa03302@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> How do you figure that? The point of logging what's done is so that you
> >> can find out what autovac has been doing, not what it's doing right now.
>
> > I don't think the server logs is the place to record history autovacuum
> > activity. I am not saying we might not need that functionality, but not
> > in the server logs, and I think others seem to agree.
>
> Um, so what do you think the server log *is* for, if not a historical
> activity record? This position would certainly surprise a lot of people
> who use the log that way ...

It is by default for unusual activity. It can be for normal activity
using the proper GUC settings, but we don't have a way to control that
just for autovacuum yet, and given what we have in 8.2, I don't see a
need to add more until users say they need more.

--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Satoshi Nagayasu 2006-08-18 01:38:13 Re: pgstattuple extension for indexes
Previous Message Michael Fuhr 2006-08-18 01:04:29 Re: Can I assume there's only one _RETURN rule?