Re: Autovacuum on by default?

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Autovacuum on by default?
Date: 2006-08-17 17:11:15
Message-ID: 200608171711.k7HHBFP16765@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Matthew T. O'Connor wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Matthew T. O'Connor wrote:
> >
> >> and increasing the log level when autovacuum actually fires off a VACUUM
> >> or ANALYZE command.
> >>
> >
> > This was not done because the logging control only for autovacuum was
> > going to be added. Right now, if you want to see the vacuum activity,
> > you end up seeing debug stuff too (very ugly).
>
> Any chance we can make this change before release? I think it's very
> important to be able to look through the logs and *know* that you tables
> are getting vacuumed or not.

Agreed. I just IM'ed Alvaro and he says pg_stat_activity should now
show exactly what autovacuum is doing (and if it doesn't, let's fix it).
I think that is the best solution to the monitoring problem, rather than
throwing lines in the server logs.

--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim C. Nasby 2006-08-17 17:11:45 Re: Enum proposal / design
Previous Message Chris Mair 2006-08-17 17:10:25 Re: [HACKERS] selecting large result sets in psql using