Re: BugTracker (Was: Re: 8.2 features status)

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
Cc: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>, Kenneth Marshall <ktm(at)is(dot)rice(dot)edu>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz>
Subject: Re: BugTracker (Was: Re: 8.2 features status)
Date: 2006-08-17 16:59:41
Message-ID: 200608171659.k7HGxfm14933@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > > I'm not sure I follow this, since currently anyone can
> > email the bugs
> > > list or use the bugs -> email form from the website. Are
> > you looking
> > > to increase the barrier for bug reporting?
> >
> > Any garbage (ie. spam) is generally filtered before it hits
> > the -bugs list itself
>
> Spam: Yes.
> Non-bug-reports: Absolutely not.
>
> The majority of things on -bugs are *not* bug reports, from what I can
> tell...

And many bugs appear on other lists, so again, it isn't just that the
bugs list isn't just bugs, but that bugs appear elsewhere.

--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2006-08-17 17:00:21 Re: BugTracker (Was: Re: 8.2 features status)
Previous Message Gregory Stark 2006-08-17 16:59:11 Re: pgsql-patches reply-to (was Re: [PATCHES] selecting