Re: Postgresql Performance on an HP DL385 and

From: Michael Stone <mstone+postgres(at)mathom(dot)us>
To: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>
Cc: Steve Poe <steve(dot)poe(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Postgresql Performance on an HP DL385 and
Date: 2006-08-14 17:09:04
Message-ID: 20060814170902.GN2900@mathom.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 12:05:46PM -0500, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
>Wow, interesting. IIRC, XFS is lower performing than ext3,

For xlog, maybe. For data, no. Both are definately slower than ext2 for
xlog, which is another reason to have xlog on a small filesystem which
doesn't need metadata journalling.

Mike Stone

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vivek Khera 2006-08-14 18:28:11 Re: Dell PowerEdge 2950 performance
Previous Message Jim C. Nasby 2006-08-14 17:05:46 Re: Postgresql Performance on an HP DL385 and