From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Dhanaraj M <Dhanaraj(dot)M(at)Sun(dot)COM> |
Cc: | pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Patch for - Change FETCH/MOVE to use int8 |
Date: | 2006-08-13 22:19:40 |
Message-ID: | 20060813221939.GA14441@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Dhanaraj M wrote:
I had a quick look:
> ***************
> *** 209,215 ****
>
> /* Return command status if wanted */
> if (completionTag)
> ! snprintf(completionTag, COMPLETION_TAG_BUFSIZE, "%s %ld",
> stmt->ismove ? "MOVE" : "FETCH",
> nprocessed);
> }
> --- 209,215 ----
>
> /* Return command status if wanted */
> if (completionTag)
> ! snprintf(completionTag, COMPLETION_TAG_BUFSIZE, "%s %lld",
> stmt->ismove ? "MOVE" : "FETCH",
> nprocessed);
> }
You shouldn't be using %lld as it breaks on some platforms.
Use INT64_FORMAT instead.
> --- ./src/backend/parser/gram.y Sun Aug 13 00:06:28 2006
> ***************
> *** 116,122 ****
>
> %union
> {
> ! int ival;
> char chr;
> char *str;
> const char *keyword;
> --- 116,122 ----
>
> %union
> {
> ! int64 ival;
> char chr;
> char *str;
> const char *keyword;
I don't think this is the right approach. Maybe it would be reasonable
to add another arm to the %union instead, not sure. The problem is the
amount of ugly casts you have to use below. The scanner code seems to
think that a constant larger than the biggest int4 should be treated as
float, so I'm not sure why this would work anyway.
> ***************
> *** 767,773 ****
> /*
> * Force the queryDesc destination to the right thing. This supports
> * MOVE, for example, which will pass in dest = DestNone. This is okay to
> ! * change as long as we do it on every fetch. (The Executor must not
> * assume that dest never changes.)
> */
> if (queryDesc)
> --- 767,773 ----
> /*
> * Force the queryDesc destination to the right thing. This supports
> * MOVE, for example, which will pass in dest = DestNone. This is okay to
> ! * change as int64 as we do it on every fetch. (The Executor must not
> * assume that dest never changes.)
> */
> if (queryDesc)
Too enthusiastic about the search'n replace I think.
I stopped reading at this point.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Perez | 2006-08-13 22:23:22 | Re: An Idea for planner hints |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2006-08-13 22:02:31 | Re: [PATCHES] Adding fulldisjunctions to the contrib |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-08-13 22:37:04 | Re: [PATCHES] Adding fulldisjunctions to the contrib |
Previous Message | Jonah H. Harris | 2006-08-13 21:02:07 | Re: [PATCHES] Adding fulldisjunctions to the contrib |