From: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Buildfarm owners: check if your HEAD build is stuck |
Date: | 2006-08-12 21:43:22 |
Message-ID: | 20060812214322.GA23000@svana.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Aug 12, 2006 at 11:29:46AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> What's happened is that that GUC patch that was in the tree for a few
> hours broke postmaster startup on some machines (for as-yet-unidentified
> reasons). The postmaster does actually start and establish its
> lockfiles, but it never gets to the stage of being able to accept
> connections.
I don't know if it's related, but coverity just started picking up a
use-after-free in parse_value() in guc.c.
At the end of the switch (case PGC_STRING) there's a free(newval)
followed by an assignment of newval to retval->stringval a few lines
further down. They mark it as line 3956 of revision 1.335.
It may not be possible though, coverity is not omnicient.
Hope this helps,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Hannu Krosing | 2006-08-12 21:59:37 | Re: Forcing current WAL file to be archived |
Previous Message | David Fetter | 2006-08-12 20:16:57 | Re: [PATCHES] extension for sql update |