From: | Roman Neuhauser <neuhauser(at)sigpipe(dot)cz> |
---|---|
To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | Kenji Morishige <kenjim(at)juniper(dot)net>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: most bang for buck with ~ $20,000 |
Date: | 2006-08-12 16:20:19 |
Message-ID: | 20060812162019.GA1340@dagan.sigpipe.cz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
# jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com / 2006-08-08 14:49:21 -0700:
> >I am considering a setup such as this:
> > - At least dual cpu (possibly with 2 cores each)
> > - 4GB of RAM
> > - 2 disk RAID 1 array for root disk
> > - 4 disk RAID 1+0 array for PGDATA
> > - 2 disk RAID 1 array for pg_xlog
> >
> >Does anyone know a vendor that might be able provide such setup?
>
> I would look at the HP DL 385 or 585. The 385 is going to max a (2) dual
> core cpus. The 585 is (4) dual core cpus.
I don't know about DL385 or DL585, but DL380 seem to go south within
1 year of heavy hitting; precisely the Smart Array RAID controllers
(4 out of 6 disks suddenly "red"; insert new disks, ooops red as
well).
I've seen this happen several times, and came away with a conclusion
that DL380 is sexy, but you don't want to marry it. Then again,
maybe the DL385 is different, though I seem to remember that both
G3 (Smart Array 5i) and G4 (6i) did this.
--
How many Vietnam vets does it take to screw in a light bulb?
You don't know, man. You don't KNOW.
Cause you weren't THERE. http://bash.org/?255991
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Chris | 2006-08-14 02:14:11 | Re: setting up foreign keys |
Previous Message | Spiegelberg, Greg | 2006-08-11 19:01:15 | Re: setting up foreign keys |