Re: 8.2 features status

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Jim Nasby <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 8.2 features status
Date: 2006-08-11 16:22:53
Message-ID: 200608111622.k7BGMrs29117@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > O.k. but no one is suggesting that we use Trac as a bug tracker, or at
> > least I wasn't. All I was suggesting was the ability to help viewing of
> > specific files as listed dependencies.
>
> I am suggesting that. I have heard all the old discussions about not
> using a bugtracker, but in all fairness, I think some of us have to
> create critical mass and get something started. Those who don't want to
> use it can choose not to use it, or they can eventually find that yeah,
> maybe it's a good idea after all. If no one does anything, nothing will
> happen.

Agreed. Seems enough people are interested that even if I don't think
it will work, it is worth a try.

--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2006-08-11 16:35:00 Re: 8.2 features status
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2006-08-11 16:18:14 Re: 8.2 features status