From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Jim Nasby <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: 8.2 features status |
Date: | 2006-08-11 16:22:53 |
Message-ID: | 200608111622.k7BGMrs29117@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > O.k. but no one is suggesting that we use Trac as a bug tracker, or at
> > least I wasn't. All I was suggesting was the ability to help viewing of
> > specific files as listed dependencies.
>
> I am suggesting that. I have heard all the old discussions about not
> using a bugtracker, but in all fairness, I think some of us have to
> create critical mass and get something started. Those who don't want to
> use it can choose not to use it, or they can eventually find that yeah,
> maybe it's a good idea after all. If no one does anything, nothing will
> happen.
Agreed. Seems enough people are interested that even if I don't think
it will work, it is worth a try.
--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2006-08-11 16:35:00 | Re: 8.2 features status |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2006-08-11 16:18:14 | Re: 8.2 features status |