From: | "Andy Foster" <andy(at)fostersontheweb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | CURRENT_TIMESTAMP wierd behaviour |
Date: | 2006-08-10 14:37:10 |
Message-ID: | 20060810143735.A34F75AF03C@svr4.postgresql.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hi all
I have created the following simple table
create table NTE_NOTES (
nte_id int unique not null,
nte_text text not null,
nte_last_updated timestamp not null,
constraint nte_pk primary key (nte_id));
If I execute the following sql as a single transaction in the admin
interface or using JDBC it appears that the CURRENT_TIMESTAMP has the same
value for all records including the updated one. Why?
insert into NTE_NOTES (nte_id, nte_text, nte_last_updated)
values(99999,'demo study note text',CURRENT_TIMESTAMP);
insert into NTE_NOTES (nte_id, nte_text, nte_last_updated)
values(29999,'demo study note text',CURRENT_TIMESTAMP);
insert into NTE_NOTES (nte_id, nte_text, nte_last_updated)
values(39999,'demo study note text',CURRENT_TIMESTAMP);
update NTE_NOTES set nte_last_updated = CURRENT_TIMESTAMP where nte_id =
99999;
select * from NTE_NOTES;
Results from call:
29999;"demo study note text";"2006-08-10 15:34:51.593"
39999;"demo study note text";"2006-08-10 15:34:51.593"
99999;"demo study note text";"2006-08-10 15:34:51.593"
Now I am not a db expert so unless this is something to do with the
transaction I would have expected different date values.
Can anyone give me an insight?
Regards
Andy Foster
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Laudeman | 2006-08-10 15:00:00 | Re: Tuning to speed select |
Previous Message | Merlin Moncure | 2006-08-10 14:26:11 | Re: Tuning to speed select |