Re: Practical maximums (was Re: PostgreSQL theoretical

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Practical maximums (was Re: PostgreSQL theoretical
Date: 2006-08-07 21:43:14
Message-ID: 20060807214314.GC2666@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Ron Johnson wrote:

> This is where a multi-threaded pg_tapedump would be more effective,
> since it would be able to, for example, have 4 threads reading
> (different parts of) the database and writing to 4 separate tape drives.

It will be difficult to have a consistent dump though. You can't do
that with separate transactions. (And you can't have multiple
simultaneous readers without separate transactions.)

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Scott Marlowe 2006-08-07 21:48:49 Re: Practical maximums (was Re: PostgreSQL theoretical
Previous Message Jeff Davis 2006-08-07 21:20:48 Re: Practical maximums (was Re: PostgreSQL theoretical