| From: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: 8.2 features status |
| Date: | 2006-08-04 22:44:28 |
| Message-ID: | 20060804224428.GJ27207@fetter.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 02:37:56PM -0700, Neil Conway wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-08-04 at 12:40 -0700, David Fetter wrote:
> > While I am not going to reopen the can of worms labeled 'bug
> > tracker', I think it would be good to have a little more formality
> > as far as claiming items goes.
>
> > What say?
>
> I think this is a good plan for adding additional process overhead,
> and getting essentially nothing of value in return. I'm not
> convinced there's a problem in need of solving here...
Perhaps you'd like to explain how big a burden on the developer it is
to send an once a week, that being what I'm proposing here.
As far as the "problem in need of solving," it's what Andrew Dunstan
referred to as "splendid isolation," which is another way of saying,
"letting the thing you've taken on gather dust while people think
you're working on it."
Cheers,
D
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666
Skype: davidfetter
Remember to vote!
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gregory Stark | 2006-08-04 23:31:00 | Re: [BUGS] Patch to allow C extension modules to initialize/finish |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-08-04 22:37:14 | Re: [PATCHES] log_statement output for protocol prepare/bind/execute |