From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | bruce(at)momjian(dot)us |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>, Oliver Jowett <oliver(at)opencloud(dot)com>, Csaba Nagy <nagy(at)ecircle-ag(dot)com>, Postgres JDBC <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PGStatement#setPrepareThreshold |
Date: | 2006-08-04 20:32:16 |
Message-ID: | 200608042032.k74KWG713489@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
bruce wrote:
> > The $64 question here is whether we want to repeat the source-text
> > in all three messages (parse, bind, execute) or try to reduce the
> > verbosity.
>
> We don't print DETAIL in the logs, do we?
>
> Does anyone have C code that uses these features so I can test?
I made a libpq test program and will work on improving the log output.
--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-08-04 21:40:55 | Re: PGStatement#setPrepareThreshold |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-08-04 19:42:02 | Re: PGStatement#setPrepareThreshold |