From: | Kevin Brown <kevin(at)sysexperts(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] LWLock statistics collector |
Date: | 2006-08-04 02:35:08 |
Message-ID: | 20060804023508.GA11514@filer |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote:
> If I thought that average users would have a need for LWLock statistics,
> I'd be more sympathetic to expending effort on a nice frontend for
> viewing the statistics, but this is and always will be just a concern
> for hardcore hackers ...
That may be true of the output, but that's not a very strong argument
against making it much easier to gather and display the LWLock
statistics. I can easily imagine the patch be a useful performance
troubleshooting tool in a high load environment. Depends on how
easy/intrusive it is to enable/use the stderr method on a production
system, though, as well as how much of a performance impact the
measurements have on overall operation...
--
Kevin Brown kevin(at)sysexperts(dot)com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-08-04 02:36:23 | Re: Values list-of-targetlists patch for comments (was Re: [PATCHES] |
Previous Message | Gavin Sherry | 2006-08-04 01:57:48 | Re: Values list-of-targetlists patch for comments (was Re: |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-08-04 02:36:23 | Re: Values list-of-targetlists patch for comments (was Re: [PATCHES] |
Previous Message | Gavin Sherry | 2006-08-04 01:57:48 | Re: Values list-of-targetlists patch for comments (was Re: |