Re: XFS filessystem for Datawarehousing

From: Michael Stone <mstone+postgres(at)mathom(dot)us>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: XFS filessystem for Datawarehousing
Date: 2006-08-02 23:33:39
Message-ID: 20060802233336.GN2900@mathom.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 02:26:39PM -0700, Steve Poe wrote:
>For the past year, I have been running odbc-bench on a dual-opteron with
>4GB of RAM using a 8GB sample data. I found the performance difference
>between EXT3, JFS, and XFS is +/- 5-8%.

That's not surprising when your db is only 2x your RAM. You'll find that
filesystem performance is much more important when your database is 10x+
your RAM (which is often the case once your database heads toward a TB).

>Testing newer kernels and read-ahead patches may benefit you as well.

I've been really impressed by the adaptive readahead patches with
postgres.

Mike Stone

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Luke Lonergan 2006-08-03 04:05:05 Re: XFS filessystem for Datawarehousing
Previous Message Chris Browne 2006-08-02 22:43:38 Re: XFS filessystem for Datawarehousing