Re: User-defined typle similar to char(length) varchar(length)

From: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
To: Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: User-defined typle similar to char(length) varchar(length)
Date: 2006-08-01 14:51:56
Message-ID: 20060801145156.GH30427@svana.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 06:47:31PM +0400, Teodor Sigaev wrote:
> >Not really, but that's another thing that seems unreasonably hard to
> >fix.
> >
> Sorry, but more problem:

<snip more problems>

No kidding, it's quite a mess and really needs to be cleaned up. About
the only thing we could do would be to merge the productions for types
and functions. Or at least, make the productions look similar enough
that bison can avoid deciding which it is until it's got past the whole
definition.

Habe a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2006-08-01 14:54:10 Re: Hash indexes
Previous Message Teodor Sigaev 2006-08-01 14:47:31 Re: User-defined typle similar to char(length) varchar(length)