| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Lor <Robert(dot)Lor(at)Sun(dot)COM> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: DTrace enabled build fails |
| Date: | 2006-07-31 13:08:55 |
| Message-ID: | 200607311308.k6VD8tG26461@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Lor wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
> >That rings a bell. Can we get a more precise designation on what
> >version of DTrace we support? And where can one get that required
> >update?
> >
> >
> >
> Peter,
>
> The problem with static function was fixed recently and is now available
> in Solaris Express (the development version of Solaris). You can get the
> bits from http://www.sun.com/software/solaris/solaris-express/get.jsp. I
> forgot to mention this know issue in my previous emails!
>
> I was told by the DTrace engineer that this fix will be in the next
> update of Solaris 10.
Do we need to add detection logic to catch buggy versions?
--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2006-07-31 13:15:03 | Re: Connection limit and Superuser |
| Previous Message | Csaba Nagy | 2006-07-31 13:07:45 | Re: Connection limit and Superuser |