From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | korryd(at)enterprisedb(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Possible explanation for Win32 stats regression test |
Date: | 2006-07-29 02:54:57 |
Message-ID: | 200607290254.k6T2svp06973@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Is anyone working on this?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tom Lane wrote:
> korry <korry(at)appx(dot)com> writes:
> > The problem is that, each time you go through
> > pgwin32_waitforsinglesocket(), you tie the *same* kernel object
> > (waitevent is static) to each socket.
>
> > The fix is pretty simple - just call WSAEventSelect( s, waitevent, 0 )
> > after WaitForMultipleObjectsEx() returns. That disassociates the socket
> > from the Event (it will get re-associated the next time
> > pgwin32_waitforsingleselect() is called.
>
> Hmm. Presumably we don't do this a whole lot (use multiple sockets) or
> we'd have noticed before. Perhaps better would be to keep an additional
> static variable saying which socket the event is currently associated
> to, and only issue the extra WSAEventSelect calls if we need to change
> it. Or is WSAEventSelect fast enough that it doesn't matter?
>
> Anyway, someone with a Windows machine needs to code and test this ...
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | mark | 2006-07-29 04:26:23 | Re: On-disk bitmap index patch |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-07-29 02:50:01 | Re: [Pgbuildfarm-members] [Fwd: RE: Build farm on Windows] |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joe Conway | 2006-07-29 06:50:05 | Re: [HACKERS] 8.2 features? |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-07-29 02:26:08 | Re: [HACKERS] pg_regress breaks on msys |