From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: A couple remarks on TODO |
Date: | 2006-07-28 19:00:33 |
Message-ID: | 200607281900.k6SJ0X927493@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Thanks, done.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tom Lane wrote:
> TODO has an entry
>
> o Allow UPDATE to handle complex aggregates [update]?
>
> which I think is now obsolete, because we've settled on rejecting
> aggregates at the top level of UPDATE, as the spec tells us to do.
>
> Also, there's one remaining unfinished feature in the multi-argument
> aggregate patch, which I think we should have a TODO item for:
>
> * Allow DISTINCT to work in multiple-argument aggregate calls
>
> The SQL2003 spec doesn't require this (it forbids DISTINCT in all its
> two-argument aggregates) but it seems like we should do it someday
> for orthogonality's sake.
>
> regards, tom lane
--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-07-28 19:01:36 | Re: Role incompatibilities |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-07-28 18:54:40 | A couple remarks on TODO |