Re: Time to scale up?

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Thomas Hallgren <thomas(at)tada(dot)se>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Paul Ramsey <pramsey(at)refractions(dot)net>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "Pgsql-Advocacy(at)Postgresql(dot)Org" <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Time to scale up?
Date: 2006-07-26 15:28:11
Message-ID: 20060726122725.M1188@ganymede.hub.org
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-www

On Wed, 26 Jul 2006, Joshua D. Drake wrote:

> Thomas Hallgren wrote:
>> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>>>
>>> Which version of Replication do we throw in here?
>>>
>> IMHO, the current players should be encouraged create a joint portfolio
>> that makes sense.
>
> All due respect but that is a pipe dream.

Agreed ... as has been stated many many times already concerning
replication ... the reason why we *don't* have an built in replication
system is that none of us truly believes that there is such thing as a
"one size fits all" replication solution ...

----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org MSN . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2006-07-26 15:30:28 Re: Time to scale up?
Previous Message Thomas Hallgren 2006-07-26 14:35:57 Re: Time to scale up?

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2006-07-26 15:30:28 Re: Time to scale up?
Previous Message Thomas Hallgren 2006-07-26 14:35:57 Re: Time to scale up?