Re: Forcing current WAL file to be archived

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Forcing current WAL file to be archived
Date: 2006-07-25 15:20:40
Message-ID: 200607251520.k6PFKeN10814@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > Where are we on these TODO items:
>
> > o Allow point-in-time recovery to archive partially filled
> > write-ahead logs [pitr]
>
> I believe we'd agreed that the necessary infrastructure for this is
> just a function to tell the current WAL segment name and offset.

Yes, perhaps, though I can envision a GUC that does regularly partial
archiving. I will add a question mark to the item. In fact, the
description has more details:

o Allow point-in-time recovery to archive partially filled
write-ahead logs? [pitr]

Currently only full WAL files are archived. This means that the
most recent transactions aren't available for recovery in case
of a disk failure. This could be triggered by a user command or
a timer.

> > o Automatically force archiving of partially-filled WAL files when
> > pg_stop_backup() is called or the server is stopped
>
> I see no need for that to be "automatic". I'd vote for a simple
> function pg_finish_wal_segment() or something like that, which you
> call just after pg_stop_backup() if you want this behavior. Trying
> to tie it into pg_stop_backup() will only make things more complicated
> and less flexible.

I assumed we would have a function like pg_finish_wal_segment(), and
server stop and stop_backup would call it too, the reason being, it
would greatly simplify our documentation on how to use PITR if these
were done automatically.

--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-07-25 15:22:44 Re: Forcing current WAL file to be archived
Previous Message Jim C. Nasby 2006-07-25 15:17:59 Re: plPHP and plRuby