From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | John Weekley <weekleyj(at)foobarlabs(dot)net>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: BUG #2546: PostgreSQL does not have native spinlock |
Date: | 2006-07-25 01:43:13 |
Message-ID: | 200607250143.k6P1hDJ29858@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Tom Lane wrote:
> "John Weekley" <weekleyj(at)foobarlabs(dot)net> writes:
> > Platform is 64 bit Solaris x86.
> > ...
> > "../../../../src/include/storage/s_lock.h", line 814: #error: PostgreSQL
> > does not have native spinlock support on this platform. To continue the
> > compilation, rerun configure using --disable-spinlocks. However,
> > performance will be poor. Please report this to pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org(dot)
>
> It looks like s_lock.h currently has coverage for amd64 using gcc, or
> sparc64 using either compiler, but not for amd64 using Sun's cc.
> Please feel free to send a patch, or you could pester Sun to send us
> one (Josh?)
amd64 support for Sun compilers will be in 8.2. It is already in CVS.
--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-07-25 01:47:36 | Re: BUG #2546: PostgreSQL does not have native spinlock |
Previous Message | Kayteck | 2006-07-25 00:58:55 | BUG #2549: problem with NATURAL JOIN |