From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, Thomas Hallgren <thomas(at)tada(dot)se> |
Subject: | Re: Time to scale up? |
Date: | 2006-07-24 17:06:43 |
Message-ID: | 200607241906.44685.peter_e@gmx.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-www |
Am Montag, 24. Juli 2006 16:35 schrieb Marc G. Fournier:
> One thing that has been talked to death many times, but nobody ever seems
> to come up with a solution to, is pgFoundry, and how badly it is
> advertised / promoted ... so software packages over there seem relegated
> to a sort of 'no mans land' ...
The challenge is to distinguish random garbage from the good, important
projects on pgFoundry. It seems that what this really comes down to is that
what need a committee that decides what the
good/important/maintained/endorsed projects are. Those projects can then get
more prominent URLs, links, etc.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2006-07-24 17:08:13 | Re: Time to scale up? |
Previous Message | Thomas Hallgren | 2006-07-24 17:04:14 | Re: Time to scale up? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2006-07-24 17:08:13 | Re: Time to scale up? |
Previous Message | Thomas Hallgren | 2006-07-24 17:04:14 | Re: Time to scale up? |