From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | Thomas Hallgren <thomas(at)tada(dot)se> |
Subject: | Re: Time to scale up? |
Date: | 2006-07-24 11:33:09 |
Message-ID: | 200607241333.10335.peter_e@gmx.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-www |
Am Montag, 24. Juli 2006 13:12 schrieb Thomas Hallgren:
> A resolution to the problem would be to allow the core team to scale up.
> More people are needed to support a more comprehensive set of features.
> So why not create specialized teams that are part of the
> core-development trust?
I don't think trust or scaling or implementation languages are the real issue.
It has been established that for a variety of reasons, smalls tools that can
be combined work better than one big tool. That is why the Linux kernel does
not contain a windowing system.
The issue you are facing is an issue of perception. There are a number of
ways to fix that, only one of which is including PL/Java into the PostgreSQL
source distribution. I was on the other side of the debate when we kicked
out the JDBC driver, but today I think this was the best thing that could
have happened, to both sides. If you see any measures that we could take to
make PL/Java look as good in the public eye as the JDBC driver -- certainly
that is a reasonable comparison -- then I'm sure we can address them.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas Hallgren | 2006-07-24 12:29:22 | Re: Time to scale up? |
Previous Message | Thomas Hallgren | 2006-07-24 11:12:20 | Time to scale up? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas Hallgren | 2006-07-24 12:29:22 | Re: Time to scale up? |
Previous Message | Thomas Hallgren | 2006-07-24 11:12:20 | Time to scale up? |