From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | Mario Weilguni <mweilguni(at)sime(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: RESET CONNECTION? |
Date: | 2006-07-19 15:43:56 |
Message-ID: | 200607191543.k6JFhub25414@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Mario Weilguni wrote:
> > > Will this patch make it into 8.2?
> > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2004-12/msg00228.php
> > >
> > > It's a really nice feature, would be extremly useful with tools like pgpool.
> >
> > No, it will not because RESET CONNECTION can mess up interface code that
> > doesn't want the connection reset. We are not sure how to handle that.
>
> Hmm, what interface code are you talking about?
I believe JDBC, for example, sets things inside the interface that would
be broken by RESET CONNECTION. Here is a thread about it:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2005-01/msg00029.php
--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-07-19 15:44:34 | Re: RESET CONNECTION? |
Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2006-07-19 15:35:42 | Re: poor performance with Context Switch Storm at TPC-W. |