Re: Online index builds

From: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)skype(dot)net>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Online index builds
Date: 2006-07-16 15:48:17
Message-ID: 200607161148.18254.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Saturday 15 July 2006 21:37, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > That said I'm not sure how much I can do here. For a substantial index we
> > should expect most of the time will be spent in the tuplesort. It's hard
> > to see how to get any sort of progress indicator out of there and as long
> > as we can't it's hard to see the point of getting one during the heap
> > scan or any of the other i/o operations.
>
> Well from a DBA perspective, just knowing that "something" productive is
> happening is useful.
>
> When using vacuum I almost always use vacuum verbose, just so I have an
> idea of what is going on.
>
+1

--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2006-07-16 15:57:55 Re: Restartable Recovery
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-07-16 14:51:47 Re: Restartable Recovery