| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: DocBook/XML summary |
| Date: | 2006-07-16 00:56:29 |
| Message-ID: | 200607160256.30287.peter_e@gmx.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > - Translation tools may work better with XML sources. (Totally
> > unconfirmed; would need to be in actual use by someone.)
>
> Do you mean language translation or transformation (as in pdf?).
Language translation
> > - More typing: Things like <abc>foo</> and other abbreviations
> > won't work anymore; all attributes would need to be quoted, etc.
>
> That is true, but we also get better interoperability, like going
> from xml->doc
How so?
> The one thing that I am still unaware of is a good print quality
> output for Docbook XML. Now to be honest I haven't checked in some
> time but one of our primary goals *needs* to be to efficiently
> convert to PDF.
You haven't read the second paragraph of my mail.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Guillaume LELARGE | 2006-07-16 15:58:53 | Re: DocBook/XML summary |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2006-07-15 23:59:14 | Re: DocBook/XML summary |