From: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Fwd: Three weeks left until feature freeze |
Date: | 2006-07-13 23:25:55 |
Message-ID: | 200607131925.55726.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thursday 13 July 2006 15:39, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > On Thu, 13 Jul 2006, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> >>> Aside from obviously the big issue of who maintains all the pgfoundry
> >>> stuff, I also think that the PostgreSQL family would benefit from a
> >>> distribution that is more "and the kitchen sink" style. I do not know
> >>> exactly if Bizgres could be considered just that? Or maybe it could get
> >>> promoted to be that?
> >>
> >> Lukas, that is what www.mammothpostgresql.org is :)
> >
> > Then *it* needs to be promoted more, since this is actually the first
> > I'd heard of it :(
>
> Were trying man :) I have people building for most major distributions
> at this point. We should have FreeBSD soon, as well as MacOSX.
>
I believe it was Lukas who mentioned elsewhere, this is not a vendor nuetral
project. I actually am already working on a adding a list of os/package
options to the download page based on other feedback, are people comfortable
allowing mammothpostgresql to go on that list? (I wouldn't be mainly because
I don't see a clear distinction between it and things like mammoth
replicator)
--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Chris Browne | 2006-07-13 23:33:31 | Standards conforming strings |
Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2006-07-13 23:24:38 | Re: Three weeks left until feature freeze |