| From: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Timothy Perrigo <tperrigo(at)wernervas(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: getting function argument names from psql? |
| Date: | 2006-07-13 13:30:49 |
| Message-ID: | 20060713133048.GC6902@fetter.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 09:22:56AM -0400, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> On 7/13/06, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> wrote:
> >On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 11:37:04PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >Back when, I submitted a psql patch to get the input names along
> >with their types. Shall I dig up that code this weekend?
>
> that would be great, although is there any concern about backwards
> compatibility of regprocedure cast?
I'm not really concerned with any backwards compatibility for this new
feature, as psql has never attempted it for backslash commands.
> would it be safer to make a new cast? also, does your patch account
> for in/out?
If it didn't, it will. :)
Cheers,
D
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666
Skype: davidfetter
Remember to vote!
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2006-07-13 13:39:34 | Re: getting function argument names from psql? |
| Previous Message | Merlin Moncure | 2006-07-13 13:22:56 | Re: getting function argument names from psql? |