Re: More nuclear options

From: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: More nuclear options
Date: 2006-07-11 20:40:36
Message-ID: 200607111640.36338.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tuesday 11 July 2006 16:33, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Robert,
>
> > I really don't see how this will actually cause you any extra effort, but
> > if you want to plug my name on there after you move it, that's fine with
> > me.
>
> I meant "maintain" it, not just leave it there to age like a bad cheese.
> If it's going to be dead code, it can do so in the FTP /old section
> and the CVS archives easily enough.
>

I'm not going to actively maintain it, my intrest is just in exposing the
information so that others might find it. Putting it on foundry gives it a
chance at finding an active maintainer... leaving it in the archives of CVS
will guarantee you don't get one. Since most people seem comfortable with
that, so be it.

--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hannu Krosing 2006-07-11 20:41:42 Re: More nuclear options
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2006-07-11 20:35:19 Re: Three weeks left until feature freeze