Re: CTIDs invalidations and dropping columns.

From: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
To: Tzahi Fadida <Tzahi(dot)ML(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: CTIDs invalidations and dropping columns.
Date: 2006-07-11 14:27:18
Message-ID: 20060711142718.GB6500@svana.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 01:50:40AM +0300, Tzahi Fadida wrote:
> As i understand rowids, i.e ctids, are supposed to allow for fast access to
> the tables. I don't see the rational, for example, when casting some
> attributes, to blank the ctid. So it is not exactly the same, but it still
> came from the same tuple. What will happen if for read only SPI queries
> it will not be blank?

Did you read the email Tom sent?

I worked out the exact issue with your example btw. It's because of the
DROP COLUMN. After dropping the column the tuples on disk have 3
columns and you only asked for 2, so an extra step has to be taken.
This extra step copies the two values, creating a new tuple, which has
no CTID.

If you're tying yourself this tightly to the backend, maybe you should
just use index_beginscan/heap_beginscan/etc which return actual tuples.

Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2006-07-11 14:32:39 Re: Three weeks left until feature freeze
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2006-07-11 14:26:54 Re: Three weeks left until feature freeze