Re: More nuclear options

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Subject: Re: More nuclear options
Date: 2006-07-11 20:24:17
Message-ID: 200607111324.17916.jd@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> Given the current number of projects that have no code / files / anything
> associated with them on pgfoundry/gborg right now, this argument rings a
> little hollow.

I would say that:

> Given the current number of projects that have no code / files / anything
> associated with them on pgfoundry/gborg right now, this argument rings a
> little hollow.

Strengthens JoshB's argument, not lessens it. That is also an argument for
Gforge admins, not hackers :)

>
> > In a year nobody has spoken up for those specific projects. Who's
> > going to maintain them? Who's going to use them?
>
> People do get pointed at adddepends even today... certainly no one will do
> anything with these projects if you nuke them, but I like giving people
> options... your call though.

They will always be able to pull down the source from a previous release.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2006-07-11 20:33:12 Re: More nuclear options
Previous Message Robert Treat 2006-07-11 20:19:26 Re: More nuclear options