Re: MS-SQL<->Postgres sync

On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 01:30:51PM -0500, Scott Marlowe wrote:
> > (which means you have to deal with failures in one database and not
> > another). Is the idea that this is multi-master?
>
> I wonder if it would be possible to write a set of triggers for MSSQL
> that would allow you to run slony daemons that connected to it and a
> postgresql server and did replication. Just mad scientisting for a
> second.

Well, yes, but that's why I asked whether it's multimaster. Because
if so, it'll be at least tricky to do under Slony I.

A

--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca
Information security isn't a technological problem. It's an economics
problem.
--Bruce Schneier